<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>THE PIANIST.COM - making pianists feel at home &#187; piano concerto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepianist.com/tag/piano-concerto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepianist.com</link>
	<description>A journey in the world of pianists, musicians, composers who changed our lives and times - Written by Italian pianist Roberta Pili</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:07:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Busoni Piano Competition &#8211; When the Jury doesn&#8217;t find the Winner&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.thepianist.com/2011/09/special-edition-the-busoni-piano-competition-when-the-jury-doesnt-find-the-winner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepianist.com/2011/09/special-edition-the-busoni-piano-competition-when-the-jury-doesnt-find-the-winner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Pili</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barishevskyi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulkina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Busoni competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chernichka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chopin competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferruccio Busoni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liszt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Argerich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pianist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piano competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piano concerto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyphony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prokofieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachmaninoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tavernaro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technique]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepianist.com/?p=614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ferruccio Busoni / Source: Wikipedia The 58th Ferruccio Busoni piano competition in Bozen just concluded. This was a good opportunity for me to think about different outcomes of the competition. As usual the most interesting aspect of this event was &#8230; <a href="http://www.thepianist.com/2011/09/special-edition-the-busoni-piano-competition-when-the-jury-doesnt-find-the-winner/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thepianist.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Ferruccio_Busoni_01.jpg"><img src="http://www.thepianist.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Ferruccio_Busoni_01-230x300.jpg" alt="Ferruccio Busoni" title="Ferruccio_Busoni_01" width="230" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-632" /></a><br />
<em>Ferruccio Busoni / Source: Wikipedia<br />
</em><br />
The 58th Ferruccio Busoni piano competition in Bozen just concluded. This was a good opportunity for me to think about different outcomes of the competition. As usual the most interesting aspect of this event was the decision of the jury. This year I noticed again that the members of the jury expressed a vote which was weird and totally out of any kind of quality, intended in both pianistic and artistic sense. Let us look more inside the competition. Antonii Barishevskyi, Anna Bulkina, Tatiana Chernichka were the three finalists of the last competition evening. By listening very carefully to their performance of piano concertos by Liszt, Rachmaninoff and Prokofieff I had enough material to be able to create a profile of each single artistic personality.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The Finalists</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Antonii Barishevskyi</strong> &#8211; The young competitor from Ukraine played Liszt&#8217;s piano concerto No.1 for his first final performance with orchestra. I immediately noticed a particular artistic individuality in his playing, when performing Liszt and later also Rachmaninoff piano concerto No.3. He demonstrated to understand the polyphonic structure of the musical score, but his technical skills were not developed enough to use them with a better knowledge for the interpretation. We come to the conclusion that Barishevskyi is still looking for his own pianistic identity, but his approach to a polyphonic playing could guide him to a good development according to the good old German-Russian piano tradition.</p>
<p><strong>Anna Bulkina</strong> &#8211; The young Russian lady showed her pianistic character right after performing Liszt&#8217;s piano concerto No.1. I missed a certain long-vibrating piano sound, her playing was generally too dry, nevertheless her technique could perfectly fit to Prokofieff&#8217;s concerto No.2.<br />
Conclusion: Bulkina&#8217;s performance was too accurate, no musical shaping of the Prokofieff&#8217;s concerto, her musical expression was just based on a technical aspect. Appropriate to Prokofieff&#8217;s style, not for the other works of the wide piano literature.</p>
<p><strong>Tatiana Chernichka</strong> &#8211; Clear technique, appropriate pedalizing, a good team-work with the orchestra. Chernichka performed well both with Liszt&#8217;s piano concerto No. 2 and Rachmaninoff concerto No.3. Sometimes her playing was too &#8220;nice&#8221;. Rachmaninoff Concerto No.3: her interpretation was not creative enough, her playing remained closed but not intrinsic, which is actually a demanding character particularly by Rachmaninoff.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The &#8220;other&#8221; prize winners</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Three further participants were not admitted to the great final stage of the Busoni competition: Alessandro Taverna, Min Soo Hong, Sun-A Park. It was not difficult to guess their artistic profile just by listening to the orchestral performance with Liszt&#8217;s piano concertos. Each of them presented a very personal interpretation of the work, according to a romantic Franz Liszt&#8217;s style. Particularly Alessandro Taverna showed sometimes polyphonic playing.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The jury&#8217;s decision</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>The international jury at the last Chopin piano competition in Warsaw 2010 (Martha Argerich was joining the jury), expressed an absolutely incompetent vote by awarding Evegeni Bozhanov only fourth prize. His playing was brilliant, of a high-professional polyphonic technique and a maturity in his interpretations.<br />
We have a similar combination at Busoni competition: the jury, with Argerich as a president and other members as Mrs. Stephanovich, showed again their limited art of voting, especially when they did not recognize the polyphonic signs in Barishevskyi&#8217;s or even Taverna&#8217;s playing. This led finally to a not-awarded first prize.<br />
Ferruccio Busoni was acclaimed and recognized as the most polyphonic pianist all-time. Right for the Busoni competition I would have wished  a jury with a deeper pianistic knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepianist.com/2011/09/special-edition-the-busoni-piano-competition-when-the-jury-doesnt-find-the-winner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sergei Wassiljevitsch Rachmaninoff &#8211; 1873-1943</title>
		<link>http://www.thepianist.com/2009/11/sergei-wassiljevitsch-rachmaninoff-1873-1943/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepianist.com/2009/11/sergei-wassiljevitsch-rachmaninoff-1873-1943/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Pili</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrapuntal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pianist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piano concerto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyphonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergei Rachmaninoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepianist.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was one of the most inspiring pianists of the twentieth century. His remarkable personality as a unique artist was perfectly reflected in all his compositions. Sergei Rachmaninoff charcterized the last Romantic piano tradition with his charming, lyric and expressive &#8230; <a href="http://www.thepianist.com/2009/11/sergei-wassiljevitsch-rachmaninoff-1873-1943/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was one of the most inspiring pianists of the twentieth century. His remarkable personality as a unique artist was perfectly reflected in all his compositions. Sergei Rachmaninoff charcterized the last Romantic piano tradition with his charming, lyric and expressive playing and creative interpretations.<br />
A virtuoso technique, rhythmic precision, colorful tone, polyphonic clarity of inner voices, incomparable sense of lyricism, accurate interpretation of different musical styles, force of expression through every detail of a composition: Rachmaninoff was in absolute possession of all these peculiar &#8220;instruments&#8221; for his performing.<br />
The great charisma of this pianist came through especially when he played his own works. Due to his personal composing style, which was first influenced by Tschaikovsky, he further developed a contrapuntal writing and a distinguished variety in the chromatic harmonic structure, both deriving from Bach and Chopin.<br />
He certainly dedicated a profound study, work and way of musical thinking from those great composers, becoming idiosyncratic when he created his own music.</p>
<p>It is known that Rachmaninoff suffered from a severe depression, caused by a breakdown after the premiere of his First Symphony. An unproductive period of about three years stressed him that much, but finally he recovered through a hypnotic therapy by the psychologist Nikolai Dahl. He was able to compose again and he wrote his gorgeous Second Piano Concerto, which was dedicated to his therapist. He recovered from that deep psychological crisis, finally being successful with the premiere of the Concerto.</p>
<p>Nevertheless a sort of darkness characterized the soul of his following works. Even his playing changed and became the idealized source of sadness of his inner being.<br />
Probably because of his emotional power Rachmaninoff´s music has been often criticized by puristic tendencies, reduced just into sentimental patterns.<br />
Of course we would face his works on the wrong side when accepting this theory, rather a deep understanding of his personality and his highly-structured music would bring us to a more faithful interpretation of the great composer.<br />
In conclusion, Rachmaninoff remains an Immortal in the universe of great pianists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepianist.com/2009/11/sergei-wassiljevitsch-rachmaninoff-1873-1943/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

